On March 14, 2011, the JRCS had the first teleconference with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) after the disaster. The JRCS reported on the situation of the affected areas, the activities of the Japanese Government and the JRCS and discussed what kind of support the IFRC could provide. In the course of the discussion, it was revealed that the donation from the Partner National Societies (PNSs) overseas had reached JPY 30 billion. As the overseas donation collected in the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in 1995 was approximately JPY 1 billion, this amount was far larger than ever before.
The donation sent from each PNS should be used for purchasing the equipment and materials necessary for the disaster relief activities implemented by the JRCS as well as for the direct costs of the other relief activities, in accordance with the "Principles and Rules for Red Cross and Red Crescent Disaster Relief”. However, in order to make maximum use of the huge sum of donation from overseas collected on this occasion, it was required to appropriately assess the needs of the three affected prefectures (Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima) and to develop an efficient large-scale assistance programme in addition to the traditional individual projects.
The scheme for assessing the needs in the affected areas and reflecting them in the projects was the very first attempt for the JRCS.
As a first step, from March 21, the JRCS made visits to the Governors of Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima, explained them that JRCS was ready to provide recovery assistance programmes utilizing the donation received from the PNSs overseas, and introduced, as examples of such assistance programmes, its provision of electrical household appliances for temporary housing as well as donation of vehicles needed for field activities.
The visits were aimed to exchange opinions and coordinate with the governments, however as the situation was still very confused while the Prefectures were trying to assess the damage, there were no specific requests or remarks from them at that point.
On March 28, a special team for responding to the donation from overseas was established in the Headquarters of Disaster Management (HDM) at the JRCS National Headquarters. In the afternoon of the same day, the provision of electrical household appliances to the people evacuated to temporary housing was decided as an assistance programme funded by the overseas donation in the meeting of the Executive Director General. The electrical household appliances package was composed of 6 electrical household appliances; a refrigerator, a TV set, a washing machine, a microwave oven, a rice cooker and an electric hot water dispenser.
Through its Chapters, the JRCS offered the local governors of the affected prefectures the donation of the electrical household appliances packages for temporary housing, and with their willing consent the JRCS started the project.
Early in April, the members of the special team were deployed in turns to the three affected prefectures with the aim of on-site coordination and needs assessment for the project for the donation of the electrical household appliances packages.
Based on the needs assessment conducted by the dispatched team members, an assistance programme plan with a budget of JPY 30 billion was finalized on April 22 as a “Draft proposal for an overall plan for the GEJET relief and recovery project (financed by donation from overseas)”.
The contents of the draft proposal were as follows.
Figure 4-1 (Draft) Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Relief and Recovery Plan(financed by donation from overseas)
【(Draft) Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Relief and Recovery Plan (financed by donation from overseas)】
-Distributing of emergency relief supplies; Purchase and replenishment of
relief supplies
-Emergency medical service; Dispatching medical teams
-Improving the living conditions of evacuation centres and temporary housing (installation of portable toilets, kitchen and shower facilities, provision of psychosocial care services and medical care, establishment of volunteer centres, provision and installation of electric household appliances, establishment of community centres)
-Rehabilitation and strengthening of health infrastructure; Rehabilitation of health system and strengthening of medical response capacity in disasters in Ishinomaki area in Miyagi.
-Social welfare and care for the elderly; provision of nursing beds and vehicles to social welfare institutions/dispatch caregiving staff
-Improving the living conditions of the affected people: Nordic walking for exercise
-Children’s education support: special assistance to the children in the affected areas.
-Capacity building of the JRCS national disaster preparedness strengthening of the JRCS National Headquarters, Chapters and facilities.
-JRCS/IFRC’s programme support cost (public relations, reporting management) salaries, external audit, etc.
The JRCS established a “Promotion Committee for the GEJET Recovery Assistance programmes” in its National Headquarters to discuss and determine the details of the recovery assistance programmes financed by the donation collected through the PNSs overseas and others. Since its establishment, a total of 13 meetings were held until the end of December 2012.
Based on the guidelines for the Establishment of the council for the GEJET Recovery Assistance Programmes, the JRCS established the “GEJET Recovery Task Force” in its Disaster Management and Social Welfare Department of the Operation Sector on May 1, 2011, with the aim of addressing the GEJET recovery assistance programmes in an intensive and comprehensive manner.
The GEJET Task Force is a self-contained organization with a certain amount of authority to implement the project. Regarding the responsible persons inside the Task Force, the experience and original posts of each staff member were taken into consideration.
In establishing the Task Force, the “Guidelines for Establishing the GEJET Recovery Task Force”, which described its aims and activities, was formulated.
According to the guidelines, the Task Force should have the aim of addressing, in an intensive and comprehensive manner, the GEJET recovery assistance program financed by the donation from overseas collected through overseas Red Cross Societies and other organizations, etc.
a. The Red Cross and Red Crescent Partnership Meeting for the GEJET in May 2011
In the middle of April 2011, it was decided to organise the Red Cross and Red Crescent Partnership Meeting for the GEJET on May 9. Following this decision, the special team for the overseas donation formulated the basic policy as an overall plan for recovery, the target fields and actual projects to be supported, and the method of providing financial report.
On May 9, 2011, the meeting was held at the JRCS National Headquarters in Tokyo. The main purpose of the meeting was that Partner National Societies (PNSs) of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement around the world, who had transferred "donation" to the JRCS in order to support its activities for the disaster recovery, could get together to discuss the use of the donation from overseas, which was expected to reach a total amount of over JPY 30 billion.
A total of 43 representatives from the PNSs (including 18 PNSs such as the United States, Australia, Austria, the United Kingdom, Canada and China, etc.), the IFRC, the ICRC, Embassies and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of Japan participated in the meeting in addition to the 19 executives from the JRCS, including the President and the Vice-President.
< Purpose of the meeting >
Prior to the meeting, a minute of silence was offered for the victims of this great disaster. The President of the JRCS stated in the opening speech that “the support from our PNSs around the world has touched our hearts, and we have reaffirmed the spirit of “togetherness” at the core of Red Cross activities”.
In the meeting, the JRCS presented to the PNSs the planning for the projects that JRCS would develop with the use of donation from overseas, and it obtained unanimous agreement. In addition, it was agreed that the funds should not be earmarked in principle.
The outline of the GEJET Relief and Recovery Plan and the main projects agreed were as follows.
(The total budget was approximately JPY 30 billion at this stage.)
Basic Approach |
---|
|
Objectives |
|
Major Initiatives |
|
Main projects agreed
【Main projects agreed】
1. Emergency reconstruction support for the medical infrastructure (approximately JPY 5 billion)
2. Support for improving the livelihoods of affected people (approximately JPY 19 billion)
3. Social welfare and support for the elderly (approximately JPY 3.5 billion)
4. Others (JPY 2.5 billion)
Regarding the finance, the basic policy, a reporting format and a schedule were reported.
Following the meeting, the delegation of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement from the participants made a field visit to Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital and evacuation centers (in Ishinomaki City, Miyagi) on May 10, and to an evacuation center (Takata Daiichi Junior High School in Rikuzen-Takata City, Iwate) and temporary housing on May 11.
b. The "Monitoring visit by the Partner National Societies of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement supporting the GEJET relief and recovery" in October-November 2011
The Monitoring visit was held for three days from October 31 to November 2, 2011.
The JRCS explained the overall plan for recovery support and its progress to the PNSs, and the IFRC evaluation team reported the findings of the evaluation of the activities funded by the overseas donation from the PNSs. Following the meeting, the members made a field visit to the affected areas.
c. The "Second Red Cross and Red Crescent Partnership Meeting for the GEJET relief and recovery" in May 2012
The second Partnership Meeting was held on May 8, 2012, in which the progress of the recovery assistance programmes and the evaluation of the activities by the IFRC as well as the response of the JRCS to the results of the evaluation were reported.
The participants acknowledged the prompt implementation of the assistance programmes and the accountability of the JRCS.